Analysis Summary:

The article appears factually accurate based on the provided verification sources. The sources confirm the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites and the reactions from various groups. The article presents a range of emotions from Trump supporters, which aligns with the potential for diverse opinions on such an event. The bias is minimal, primarily objective reporting with slight word choice influence.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "U.S.’ Bombing of Nuclear Sites in Iran" - `Verification Source #1`, `Verification Source #2`, `Verification Source #3`, `Verification Source #5`: All confirm the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites.
• Claim:** "Trump supporters expressed a range of emotions — anger, wariness and avid support." - `Verification Source #4`: Suggests potential criticism from MAGA anti-interventionists, implying a range of reactions. The article's claim is plausible and not contradicted by the sources.
• Claim:** "But the dominant theme? Anxiety about what comes next." - This is an interpretation of the interviews conducted. While the sources don't directly confirm this specific claim, they do highlight the serious consequences and potential for escalation, making anxiety a plausible reaction.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• `Verification Source #1`, `Verification Source #2`, `Verification Source #3`, `Verification Source #5`: All confirm the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
• `Verification Source #4`: Suggests that Trump's decision may draw criticism from MAGA anti-interventionists, supporting the idea of diverse reactions among Trump supporters.
• The sources do not directly confirm the "dominant theme" of anxiety, but the overall context of the events suggests it is a plausible reaction.