‘Watch Me,’ Biden Said. But Hearing Him in Hur Interview Is More Revealing.
‘Watch Me,’ Biden Said. But Hearing Him in Hur Interview Is More Revealing.

The former president’s halting responses to questions by a special counsel show him exactly as a majority of Americans believed him to be — and as Democrats repeatedly insisted he was not.
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's factual accuracy is mixed. The claim about the majority of Americans' perception of Biden and the Democrats' insistence on a different image is subjective and difficult to verify directly with the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias through its framing and selective presentation of information.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim:** "The former president’s halting responses to questions by a special counsel show him exactly as a majority of Americans believed him to be — and as Democrats repeatedly insisted he was not."
- This is a subjective interpretation of the audio interview. The claim about the majority of Americans' belief is an opinion and cannot be directly verified with the provided sources. The claim about Democrats' insistence is also difficult to verify without specific examples of their statements.
- Verification Source #1: The report itself (justice.gov) provides the factual basis for the investigation but doesn't address public perception or Democratic messaging.
- Verification Source #3: The PBS article discusses the political battle surrounding the report but doesn't directly verify the claim about public perception or Democratic messaging.
- Verification Source #2 and #4: These sources are about Donald Trump and do not provide information about the claims made in the article about Biden.
- Verification Source #5: This source is about Kamala Harris and does not provide information about the claims made in the article about Biden.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- The provided sources do not directly support or contradict the claim about the majority of Americans' perception of Biden or the Democrats' insistence on a different image. This is a subjective interpretation presented by the article.
- Verification Source #1 provides the official report, which is the factual basis for the article's discussion, but it doesn't address the subjective claims about public perception or political messaging.
- The lack of coverage in the provided sources highlights the subjective and potentially biased nature of the claim.