Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the available information. The key claim about the type of data stolen is plausible given the nature of legal aid organizations, although direct verification of this specific claim is limited by the provided sources. The article presents the information in a relatively neutral tone, with minimal observable bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** MoJ says data includes addresses, national ID numbers, criminal histories and financial details dating to 2010.
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this specific claim, but provides general information about data breach responses.
  • Verification Source #2: Fails to cover this specific claim, focusing on Apple's legal process guidelines.
  • Verification Source #3: Fails to cover this specific claim, but provides context on cybercrime and hack forums.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the general idea that criminals steal personal data using computer technology.
  • Verification Source #5: Fails to cover this specific claim, focusing on finding legal aid.
  • Internal Knowledge: It is plausible that a legal aid organization would possess such data.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #4: "In some cases, criminals reportedly have used computer technology to steal large amounts of personal data." This supports the general premise of the article, although it doesn't confirm the specifics of the Legal Aid hack.
• The lack of direct confirmation from the provided sources regarding the specific data types stolen is a limitation. However, the nature of legal aid work makes it plausible that they would hold such sensitive information.