Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the main claims about Simon Mann's life and death being supported by multiple sources. There is a slight bias towards portraying him as a mercenary involved in controversial activities, but it's not extreme. Some details, like the specific nature of his "successful career" in the British Army, are not elaborated upon or verified by the provided sources.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Simon Mann dies at 72.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, and #4: Support this claim.
• Claim:** After Eton and a successful career in the British Army, he became the go-to guy for military coups.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions he was a former SAS officer, supporting his military background.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #4, and #5: Support his involvement in a coup plot in Equatorial Guinea.
• Fail to cover:* The extent of his "successful career" in the British Army or whether he was the "go-to guy" for military coups is not explicitly verified by the provided sources. This relies on the article's interpretation.
• Claim:** The rewards (and risks) were enormous.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #4: Mention he made millions of pounds, supporting the "rewards" aspect.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #4: Mention he was sentenced to 34 years, supporting the "risks" aspect.
• Claim:** Attempt to overthrow the west African nation's ruler.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, and #4: Support this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: States that he attempted to overthrow Equatorial Guinea's president.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All sources agree on the fact that Simon Mann died at the age of 72 (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4).
• Agreement:** Multiple sources confirm his involvement in a coup plot in Equatorial Guinea (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5).
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific details of his military career and the extent of his involvement in other coups are not covered in detail by the provided sources.
• Potential Bias:** The description of him as the "go-to guy for military coups" is a potentially biased characterization, as it's not directly supported by the provided sources, although his involvement in the Equatorial Guinea plot lends credence to this.