Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about Trump's actions against higher education being viewed negatively in China is plausible but lacks direct verification. The article exhibits moderate bias by framing the situation from a specific perspective (Chinese viewpoint) without presenting counter-arguments or alternative interpretations.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "President Trump’s moves against higher education are being seen in China as a blow to one of the last admirable American institutions."
  • Verification Source #3: Partially supports the idea that China is viewing US actions negatively, specifically regarding trade wars. However, it doesn't directly address the impact on higher education or Trump's specific actions.
• Fail to cover:* The provided sources do not directly confirm or deny that Trump took actions against higher education or that the Chinese view Harvard as an admirable institution. This relies on the assumption that actions like tariffs or policies affecting international students would be perceived negatively.
• Internal Knowledge:* Without specific details on "Trump's moves," it's difficult to assess accuracy. Policies affecting student visas or research funding could be interpreted as attacks on higher education.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #3: Suggests a negative view of US trade policies in China, which could extend to other areas.
• Lack of Coverage:* No source directly confirms the specific claim about Trump's actions against higher education or the Chinese perception of Harvard.