Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The claim about women leading protests against the previous president is plausible but unverified with the provided sources. The statement about candidates not addressing discrimination against women suggests a negative slant towards the candidates, which is a potential bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Women took the lead in the protests against South Korea’s last president.
• Verification Source Coverage: None of the provided sources cover this claim.
• Analysis: This claim is unverified. Without specific information about the protests and the role of women, it's impossible to assess its accuracy using the provided sources. Internal knowledge suggests that South Korea has had significant protests in recent years, but the specific role of women in leading them requires further verification.
• Claim:** But the men running to replace him are saying little about the discrimination they face.
• Verification Source Coverage: None of the provided sources cover this claim.
• Analysis: This claim is also unverified. It implies a lack of attention to women's issues by the male candidates, which could be a form of bias if presented without context or opposing viewpoints. The phrase "saying little" is vague and subjective.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Lack of Coverage: The provided sources do not offer any information about South Korean politics, elections, or the role of women in protests. Therefore, it's impossible to verify the claims made in the article using these sources.
• Bias Indication: The statement that male candidates are "saying little about the discrimination they face" (referring to women) suggests a negative framing of the candidates and a potential bias towards highlighting a perceived lack of attention to women's issues.