Google's digital ad network an illegal monopoly, judge rules
Google's digital ad network an illegal monopoly, judge rules
The ruling involving Google’s online ad technology follows a similar case last year in which Google’s search engine was declared a monopoly.
Read the full article on CBS Money
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate, with the core claim of a judge ruling Google's ad network an illegal monopoly being supported by multiple sources. However, the statement about a similar case last year declaring Google's search engine a monopoly requires careful interpretation, as some sources indicate a ruling on search *ads* rather than the entire search engine. There is a slight negative slant towards Google due to the focus on the antitrust ruling.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Google's digital ad network is an illegal monopoly, judge rules.
- Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating Google has illegally built "monopoly power" with its web advertising.
- Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, stating Google operates illegal monopolies over two separate markets related to digital advertising technology.
- Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, indicating a federal court held Google maintained an illegal monopoly.
- Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, referencing the Justice Department's lawsuit against Google for monopolizing digital advertising technologies.
- Verification Source #5: Does not directly contradict, but focuses on a separate ruling about search ads.
- Claim: The ruling follows a similar case last year in which Google's search engine was declared a monopoly.
- Verification Source #3: Mentions Google maintained its illegal monopoly in online search markets.
- Verification Source #5: States the court did *not* find that Google has a monopoly in search ads. This contradicts the claim that the *search engine* was declared a monopoly. It is important to note the distinction between search ads and the search engine itself.
- Verification Source #1, #2, and #4: Do not directly address the previous case regarding Google's search engine.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Agreement: Multiple sources (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4) agree that a judge ruled Google's digital ad network an illegal monopoly.
- Contradiction: Verification Source #5 contradicts the claim that Google's *search engine* was declared a monopoly in a previous case. It states the court did not find a monopoly in *search ads*. This suggests the CBS Money article may be conflating rulings on search ads with rulings on the entire search engine.
- Lack of Coverage: Verification Source #1, #2, and #4 do not provide information about a previous ruling on Google's search engine.