Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, with the central claim about Meta's poaching attempts and the $100 million figure supported by multiple sources. The article presents a straightforward account of the situation with minimal discernible bias. Some details, such as the specific wording of Sam Altman's statement, are not directly verifiable through the provided sources but are plausible.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Sam Altman said Meta offering $100m plus to poach his staff.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating "Sam Altman says Meta offered $100 million bonuses to OpenAI employees."
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, stating "OpenAI CEO: Zucc is offering $100 million dollar signing bonuses to poach talent."
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, stating "Sam Altman says Meta tried and failed to poach OpenAI's talent with $100M offers."
  • Verification Source #3: Fails to cover this specific claim directly, but is a general tech news source.
  • Verification Source #5: Fails to cover this specific claim directly, focusing on founder liquidity.
• Claim:** Sam Altman said so far none of his "best people" had jumped ship to his big tech rival.
• This claim is not directly verifiable with the provided sources. While Verification Source #4 mentions Meta "tried and failed to poach OpenAI's talent," it doesn't explicitly confirm that none of the "best people" left.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Sources #1, #2, and #4 all agree that Sam Altman stated Meta offered $100 million (or bonuses of that amount) to OpenAI employees.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific claim about none of the "best people" leaving is not directly supported or contradicted by the provided sources.
• Internal Knowledge:** While not explicitly stated in the provided sources, it is generally understood that Meta and OpenAI are competitors in the AI space. This provides context for the poaching attempts.