Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The core claim about tapping stimulating acupressure points is plausible but lacks direct verification from the provided sources. The sources primarily focus on "Psych 101" as a course title or book series, not the specific practice of tapping. There's a moderate bias due to the lack of critical evaluation of the practice.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Proponents say that manually stimulating acupressure points can ease a variety of maladies."
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Internal Knowledge: This claim aligns with the general concept of acupressure, which is a traditional Chinese medicine technique. However, the efficacy of acupressure for various maladies is a subject of ongoing debate and research. Without specific evidence supporting the claim in the context of "tapping," the accuracy is uncertain.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer any direct support or contradiction for the claim about tapping and acupressure points. They primarily focus on the "Psych 101" title as it relates to books or lectures.
• Internal Knowledge: While acupressure is a recognized practice, the specific effectiveness of "tapping" for various maladies requires further investigation and evidence-based support.