Analysis Summary:

The article makes a claim about MPs backing assisted dying and its potential impact. While the claim about MPs backing assisted dying is plausible given the context of BBC Politics, the assertion that it's "likely to become law" and represents a "socially liberal direction" requires more evidence and is potentially biased. The provided sources don't directly verify the specific claim about assisted dying in the UK, but they do offer context on social change in general.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "MPs back assisted dying - the second vote this week that takes the UK in a socially liberal direction."
• Verification Source #1, #2, #4: These sources generally discuss social change but do not specifically address assisted dying in the UK. They *fail to cover* this specific claim.
• Verification Source #3, #5: These sources are irrelevant to the topic.
• Internal Knowledge:* While I cannot confirm the specific vote count or details without further sources, it is plausible that MPs have voted on assisted dying. The phrase "socially liberal direction" is an interpretation and could be considered biased.
• Claim 2:** "profound social change that is now likely to become law"
• Verification Source #1, #2, #4: These sources discuss social change in general terms. Verification Source #4 mentions countries "democratically accepting profound social change," but it doesn't confirm the specific claim about assisted dying becoming law in the UK. They *fail to cover* this specific claim.
• Verification Source #3, #5: These sources are irrelevant to the topic.
• Internal Knowledge:* The phrase "likely to become law" is a prediction and could be considered biased, as the legislative process is complex and uncertain.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not directly support or contradict the specific claims made in the article about assisted dying in the UK.
• Verification Source #2: Defines social change as "the way human interactions and relationships transform cultural and social institutions over time, having a profound impact on society." This provides a general definition of social change, which is relevant to the article's title.
• Verification Source #4: Mentions "profound social change" in the context of countries democratically accepting it, but it doesn't relate to the specific topic of assisted dying in the UK.
• The lack of direct verification for the specific claims necessitates a lower factual accuracy score. The use of subjective language like "socially liberal direction" and "likely to become law" introduces potential bias.