Analysis Summary:

The article is factually accurate. It correctly states that the Supreme Court will hear the case of a Rastafarian inmate whose dreadlocks were shaved by prison guards. The provided sources confirm this information.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of a former Louisiana prison inmate whose dreadlocks were shaved by guards in violation of his religious beliefs.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating Damon Landor asked the Supreme Court to hear his case after prison officials in Louisiana shaved his head.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, mentioning the Supreme Court will hear the case of a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were shaved in prison.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, mentioning Landor asked the Supreme Court to hear his case.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, stating the Supreme Court will hear the case of a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were shaved by Louisiana prison guards.
  • Verification Source #5: Provides background, indicating a lower court ruling blocked the inmate from seeking payment.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• All sources confirm that the Supreme Court will hear the case of a Rastafarian inmate whose dreadlocks were shaved in a Louisiana prison. `Verification Source #1`, `Verification Source #2`, `Verification Source #3`, `Verification Source #4`.
• `Verification Source #2` specifies the inmate's name as Damon Landor and mentions he was in prison for drug possession. It also notes his dreadlocks were near knee-length.
• `Verification Source #5` provides context by stating that a lower court had previously ruled against the inmate.
• There are no contradictions between the sources.