Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the central claim that Trump's actions bypassed congressional authorization being supported by multiple sources. There's a moderate bias evident in the framing, particularly regarding the "bipartisan trend" and the consolidation of executive power. Some claims are not directly verifiable within the provided sources, but align with the overall narrative.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Bombing Iran without congressional authorization escalated a bipartisan trend of presidents bypassing the original intent of the Constitution.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the idea that the legality of the strikes is questioned due to the War Powers Resolution.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim that Trump avoided asking Congress for permission.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that Trump ordered the attack without congressional authorization.
  • Verification Source #1: Provides historical context of presidential war powers being questioned, supporting the "bipartisan trend" aspect, although it refers to Syria, not Iran.
  • Verification Source #5: States the strikes violate both the Constitution and the 1973 War Powers Act.
• Claim:** The strikes violate the Constitution and the 1973 War Powers Act.
  • Verification Source #5: Directly supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Implies this claim by stating the legal question flows from the War Powers Resolution.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim by stating that the Constitution says only the legislature can declare war.
• Claim:** Trump's second term has been marked by efforts to consolidate executive power under the president's.
  • Verification Source #4: Directly supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Multiple sources (Verification Source #2, Verification Source #3, Verification Source #4, Verification Source #5) agree that Trump's actions regarding Iran were taken without congressional authorization, raising questions about their legality under the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution.
• Agreement:** Verification Source #4 supports the claim that Trump's second term has been marked by efforts to consolidate executive power.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific phrase "bipartisan trend of presidents bypassing the original intent of the Constitution" is not explicitly covered by all sources, but Verification Source #1 provides context of similar issues with presidential war powers in the past (Syria strike), lending some support to the idea of a trend.
• No Contradictions:** No sources directly contradict the claims made in the article snippet.