Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the central claim of Iran suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog being supported by multiple sources. The statement regarding potential revival of bomb plans introduces a degree of bias, as it presents a potential future action as a likely consequence. The article could benefit from more balanced framing.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Iran Suspends Cooperation With U.N. Nuclear Watchdog.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.
• Claim:** International inspectors will not be able to oversee sites.
  • Verification Source #5: States it wasn't immediately clear what the suspension would mean for the IAEA. This suggests the claim is likely true, but the immediate impact is not fully defined.
• Claim:** Experts warn that Tehran could revive plans to build a bomb.
• This claim is not directly supported or contradicted by the provided sources. While the suspension of cooperation raises concerns, the statement frames it as a likely consequence, which introduces bias. This is a potential interpretation, but not a definitively verified fact within the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All sources (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) agree that Iran is suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog (IAEA).
• Agreement:** Verification Source #1, #3, and #4 mention that the suspension follows a law passed by Iran's parliament and approved by a constitutional watchdog.
• Lack of Coverage/Potential Bias:** The claim about Tehran reviving plans to build a bomb is not directly supported by the provided sources. It represents a potential interpretation of the situation, introducing a degree of bias by presenting it as a likely consequence.