Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, stating that the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban. This is supported by multiple sources. However, the headline uses the term "liberal majority," which introduces a degree of bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The Wisconsin Supreme Court has struck down the state’s 176-year-old abortion ban."
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that a case seeks to strike down an 1849 law (176-year-old law) that arguably bans abortion.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that the liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court could strike down the 176-year-old ban.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that the court's new liberal majority ruled on the interpretation of the 176-year-old law.
• The snippet provided is limited, but the claim is supported by multiple sources.

• Claim:** Implied claim that the court has a "liberal majority."
  • Verification Source #2: Explicitly mentions that Susan Crawford's position gives liberals the votes.
  • Verification Source #4: Refers to the "new liberal majority."
• This claim is supported by multiple sources. However, labeling the majority as "liberal" introduces a degree of bias.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #2, and #4 all support the existence of a 176-year-old law related to abortion in Wisconsin and the potential or actual impact of the Supreme Court.
• Verification Source #2 and #4 support the existence of a "liberal majority" on the court.
• Verification Source #3 (Dobbs v. Jackson) is tangentially related as it discusses the Supreme Court's stance on abortion rights, but doesn't directly verify the claims about the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
• Verification Source #5 (Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional) is not directly relevant to the specific claim about the Wisconsin abortion ban.