U.S. Employers added 147,000 jobs in June
U.S. Employers added 147,000 jobs in June

Employers across the U.S. added 147,000 jobs in June, while the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1%.
Read the full article on CBS Money
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article contains a significant factual error regarding the job numbers for June. All provided sources indicate that the job numbers reported are for May, not June. There is a slight positive bias due to the use of the word "solid" in one of the source titles, but the CBS article itself doesn't exhibit strong bias beyond potentially misleading reporting of the time period.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim 1:** "Employers across the U.S. added 147,000 jobs in June"
- Verification Source #1: Contradicts. Reports 139,000 jobs added in May.
- Verification Source #2: Contradicts. Reports 139,000 jobs added in May.
- Verification Source #3: Fails to cover June numbers.
- Verification Source #4: Contradicts. Reports 139,000 jobs added in May.
- Verification Source #5: Contradicts. Reports 139,000 jobs added in May.
- Claim 2:** "while the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1%"
- Verification Source #1: Contradicts. Reports unemployment rate remained at 4.2% in May.
- Verification Source #2: Contradicts. Reports unemployment rate stayed at 4.2% in May.
- Verification Source #3: Fails to cover June numbers.
- Verification Source #4: Fails to cover June numbers.
- Verification Source #5: Contradicts. Reports unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.2% in May.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Contradiction:** All provided sources (Verification Source #1, Verification Source #2, Verification Source #4, Verification Source #5) explicitly state that the job numbers are for May, not June. The numbers reported are consistently around 139,000, not 147,000.
- Contradiction:** All provided sources (Verification Source #1, Verification Source #2, Verification Source #5) report the unemployment rate as 4.2% for May, not 4.1% as claimed in the article.
- Agreement:** Verification Source #2 uses the word "solid" to describe the job growth, which could be interpreted as a slight positive bias.