Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. The claim that the American Revolution created a "new thing called a citizen" is a broad statement that is difficult to verify directly with the provided sources. The sources do not directly address the specific claim, so it's difficult to assess its accuracy definitively. There's a moderate level of bias due to the lack of context and potential for oversimplification.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** The American Revolution created a "new thing called a citizen."
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #4: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Fails to cover this claim.
  • Internal Knowledge:* This is a complex historical argument. While the American Revolution certainly influenced concepts of citizenship, the idea of a "citizen" existed in various forms before the revolution (e.g., in ancient Greece and Rome). The American Revolution arguably redefined and broadened the concept, but it didn't invent it.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer any direct support or contradiction for the claim.
• Internal Knowledge:* The claim is an oversimplification. While the American Revolution was pivotal in shaping modern citizenship, the concept itself predates the event.