Analysis Summary: The article's accuracy is questionable. The core claim that Chris Webster "knew within moments" Erin Patterson was a killer is subjective and lacks verifiable factual basis. The headline itself uses sensational language. The provided sources offer tangential information but do not directly verify or contradict the article's central assertion.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim: Chris Webster says he knew within moments of meeting Erin Patterson that she was a 'heinous' killer.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: These sources do not cover Chris Webster's opinion or interaction with Erin Patterson. They provide background on similar cases or tangential information.
  • This claim is an opinion and difficult to verify factually. It relies on the subjective assessment of Chris Webster. Without further context or corroboration, it's impossible to assess its accuracy.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• There is no supporting evidence within the provided sources for the claim that Chris Webster immediately identified Erin Patterson as a "heinous" killer.
• The sources focus on the Erin Patterson case (Verification Source #3, #5), other unrelated events (Verification Source #1, #2, #4).
• The lack of coverage in the provided sources prevents a definitive assessment of the claim's accuracy.