Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on constitutionality of racial redistricting
Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on constitutionality of racial redistricting
In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments for the next term over the Louisiana congressional map that created a second majority-Black district.
Read the full article on CBS Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate, stating that the Supreme Court is hearing arguments regarding Louisiana's congressional map and racial redistricting. There is a slight bias due to the framing of the issue, but the core facts are verifiable. The article could benefit from a more balanced presentation of arguments for and against the redistricting plan.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments for the next term over the Louisiana congressional map that created a second majority-Black district.
- Verification Source #1: Confirms the Supreme Court is hearing a Louisiana redistricting case.
- Verification Source #3: Confirms the Supreme Court hears arguments in Louisiana redistricting case.
- Assessment: Supported
- Claim: The case concerns the constitutionality of racial redistricting.
- Verification Source #1: The court said it violated the Constitution by relying too much on race.
- Verification Source #3: Tees up a series of important questions that deal with race and redistricting.
- Verification Source #5: The US Supreme Court hears two big cases, one on how much power Congress may constitutionally delegate to the administrative, and the other on racial gerrymandering.
- Assessment: Supported
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 1: "... court said it violated the Constitution by relying too much on race to meet the first court's demands."
- Source 3: "Supreme Court hears arguments in Louisiana redistricting case. - ... tees up a series of important questions that deal with race and redistricting"