Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. The claim about the discovery of remains is plausible, but the specific details about the woman's status and the site's history as a garbage dump are not verifiable with the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias through potentially sensationalized language ("elite woman") and a lack of contextual information.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Remains of 5,000-year-old "elite woman" found.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: These sources *fail to cover* this claim.
• Analysis: Without external sources, it's impossible to verify the age of the remains or the "elite" status. This relies on the credibility of CBS Science.
• Claim:** Mummy was found in Aspero, a sacred site within the city of Caral.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: These sources *fail to cover* this claim.
• Analysis: The location of the discovery is not verifiable with the provided sources.
• Claim:** Aspero was a garbage dump for over 30 years until becoming an archaeological site in the 1990s.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5: These sources *fail to cover* this claim.
• Analysis: The history of Aspero as a garbage dump is not verifiable with the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer any supporting evidence or contradictions for the claims made in the article. All claims are unverified based on the given sources.
• Due to the lack of source coverage, internal knowledge cannot be used to verify the claims.