Lawyers for Letitia James Say Case Against Her Was Motivated by Animus
Lawyers for Letitia James Say Case Against Her Was Motivated by Animus
The argument came in a motion seeking to dismiss the case against her, citing a laundry list of statements President Trump has made about New York’s attorney general over the past six years.
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article is mostly accurate, reporting on a legal motion filed by Letitia James' lawyers. The primary claim, that the case against her is motivated by animus, is supported by the article snippet and source 4. However, the article focuses on James' perspective, potentially introducing a slight bias.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Lawyers for Letitia James are seeking to dismiss the case against her.
- Verification Source #4: Letitia James calls mortgage fraud case against her vindictive and asks judge to dismiss it.
- Assessment: Supported
- Claim: The motion to dismiss cites statements President Trump has made about Letitia James.
- Verification Source #4: case was driven by personal animus that arose out of James' lawsuit against Trump and his companies in her capacity as state attorney general.
- Assessment: Supported
- Claim: The case against Letitia James is motivated by animus.
- Verification Source #4: Letitia James calls mortgage fraud case against her vindictive and asks judge to dismiss it.
- Assessment: Supported
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 4: Letitia James calls mortgage fraud case against her vindictive and asks judge to dismiss it.