A Supreme Court Veteran and a Newcomer Will Make the Case Against Trump’s Tariffs
A Supreme Court Veteran and a Newcomer Will Make the Case Against Trump’s Tariffs
Neal Katyal, who has argued over 50 cases before the court, represents a group of businesses. Benjamin Gutman, Oregon’s solicitor general, represents a coalition of states and is making his first appearance.
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article presents a scenario about a Supreme Court case regarding Trump's tariffs in 2025. While the lawyers mentioned are real people, the scenario itself is speculative and the provided sources do not confirm the specific case or its details. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on a controversial aspect of Trump's presidency.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Neal Katyal represents a group of businesses before the Supreme Court.
- Verification Source #5: Source 5 mentions that experienced lawyers before the Supreme Court are beneficial to litigants.
- Assessment: Unverified. While Neal Katyal is a real lawyer who has argued before the Supreme Court, the specific claim about representing businesses in a case about Trump's tariffs in 2025 is not verifiable from the provided sources.
- Claim: Benjamin Gutman, Oregon’s solicitor general, represents a coalition of states and is making his first appearance before the Supreme Court.
- Assessment: Unverified. While it is possible Benjamin Gutman is Oregon's solicitor general, the claim about his first appearance before the Supreme Court representing a coalition of states regarding Trump's tariffs in 2025 is not verifiable from the provided sources.
- Claim: The case is about Trump's tariffs.
- Assessment: Unverified. None of the provided sources confirm a Supreme Court case about Trump's tariffs in 2025.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- The article is dated November 5, 2025, making it a future prediction. None of the provided sources confirm the existence of the described Supreme Court case.
- Source 3 mentions President Trump and his comments towards Veterans, which could be seen as a biased reference depending on the context.