Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the available information. The primary claim regarding the attorneys' defense strategy is supported by Verification Source #3. There is a slight bias towards neutrality, presenting the defense's perspective without strong counterarguments.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** The trial of former Tennessee House speaker and his onetime chief of staff on bribery, kickback and money laundering charges is underway.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports this claim, stating the trial of former Republican Rep. Glen Casada and his former aide, Cade Cothren, is underway.
• Claim:** Defense attorneys argue that the pair did nothing illegal.
  • Verification Source #2: Provides context, quoting someone saying Casada "never asked me to do anything illegal."
  • Verification Source #3: Implicitly supports this by stating the trial will include testimony. The defense's argument is the core of their case.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #3: Confirms the trial is underway and involves the charges mentioned.
• Verification Source #2: Provides a quote that supports the idea that Casada's actions were not perceived as illegal by at least one individual.
• The other verification sources (Verification Source #1, Verification Source #4, Verification Source #5) are irrelevant to the claims made in the article.