Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, with the deployment of B-2 bombers and Trump's consideration of a strike on Iran supported by multiple sources. However, the claim about Trump's scheduled return to the White House lacks direct verification and contributes to a slightly biased tone, suggesting an impending crisis. The article leans towards a narrative of escalating tensions.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** B-2 bombers head across the Pacific.
• Verification Source #3: Mentions B-2 bombers in the context of reaching Iran. This supports the deployment of B-2 bombers.
• Verification Source #N/A: The specific location of the bombers heading "across the Pacific" is not explicitly confirmed, but Guam is a likely location for deployment in the Pacific.
• Claim 2:** Trump is considering a strike on Iran.
• Verification Source #1: States that the US was considering joining Israel's bombing campaign.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions Trump considering an Iran attack.
• Verification Source #3: States "Trump Seeks Surrender By Iran as He Considers Attack on Nuclear Site."
• Verification Source #4: Mentions Israel's strikes against Tehran as Trump issues an ominous warning.
• Claim 3:** Trump is scheduled to return to the White House.
• Verification Source #N/A: None of the provided sources mention Trump's scheduled return to the White House. This claim is unverified.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Multiple sources (Verification Source #1, Verification Source #2, Verification Source #3, Verification Source #4) agree that Trump is considering a strike on Iran.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the sources cover the claim about Trump's scheduled return to the White House.
• Inference:** The title and snippet create a sense of urgency and impending action, potentially influencing the reader's perception of the situation.