Analysis Summary:

The article's core claim that big tech's energy demands are making coal-fired power plant sites attractive appears to be accurate, based on the provided sources. However, the snippet is very short, limiting a full assessment. There's a slight slant towards highlighting the potential for coal plant sites to be repurposed for other energy sources, which could be interpreted as a moderate bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Coal-fired power plants, long a money-losing proposition in the U.S., are becoming more valuable now.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the idea that these sites are becoming more valuable, adding that the existing infrastructure can be used for other energy sources.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 all contain the same initial sentence, suggesting they are all based on the same original Associated Press article. This strengthens the support for the claim that coal-fired power plant sites are becoming more valuable.
• Verification Source #3 adds that the sites are attractive because of the existing grid connections, which can be used for other energy sources. This adds nuance to the claim, suggesting it's not necessarily a resurgence of coal power, but rather a repurposing of existing infrastructure.
• There are no contradictions among the provided sources.