Analysis Summary: The article appears mostly accurate, focusing on the delays in compensation for victims of the infected blood scandal. The claim about the inquiry chair's statement is supported by available sources. There is a slight leaning towards highlighting the plight of the victims, but it doesn't significantly distort the facts.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim: Payments need to be made fairer and faster, the chair of the public inquiry into the disaster says.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the general idea that the inquiry called for immediate compensation.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the idea that the inquiry chair is involved and has made statements regarding the scandal.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the idea that there are concerns about compensation.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the idea that compensation payments are being discussed in Parliament.
  • Verification Source #5: Fails to cover the specific statement about fairness and speed, but provides context about the inquiry.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "The infected blood inquiry called for immediate compensation..." This supports the claim that the inquiry is pushing for faster payments.
• Verification Source #2: "...Infected blood disaster was no accident, says inquiry chair..." This confirms the inquiry chair is a key figure in addressing the scandal.
• Verification Source #3: "Support groups write to Infected Blood Inquiry chair over compensation concerns." This shows that compensation is a significant issue being addressed by the inquiry chair.
• Verification Source #4: "...enable compensation payments to begin for those affected." This confirms that compensation payments are in progress.
• There are no direct contradictions among the sources. The primary limitation is the lack of a direct quote from the inquiry chair in the provided sources confirming the exact wording used in the BBC article.