Analysis Summary:

The article's factual accuracy is mixed. While it references concerns about production standards of the Boeing 787, the claim that it was "deemed the 'safest' of planes" is not directly supported by the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on whistleblower concerns, potentially creating a negative perception of the 787.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Boeing's 787 Dreamliner was deemed the 'safest' of planes."
  • Verification Source #4: Suggests the Boeing 787 is safe, citing its long operational history and number of aircraft produced. However, it doesn't explicitly state it was "deemed the 'safest'."
  • Verification Source #1: Only repeats the title of the article.
  • Verification Source #2, #3, #5: *Fail to cover* this specific claim.
• Analysis:** The claim is not directly supported by the provided sources. While some sources suggest the 787 is safe, none explicitly state it was "deemed the 'safest'."
• Claim:** "Long before the Air India tragedy, the cause of which is still to be determined, people who had worked on the 787 had raised concerns about the production standards."
  • Verification Source #1: Repeats this claim.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions the 787 and corporate culture issues related to safety.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions the 787 Dreamliner in relation to quality control.
  • Verification Source #2, #4: *Fail to cover* this specific claim.
• Analysis:** This claim is supported by the sources, which indicate concerns about the 787's production and quality control.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #4: "The Boeing 787 is safe" suggests a level of safety, but doesn't quantify it as "safest."
• Verification Source #3: "The Story of Boeing's Failed Corporate Culture" implies potential issues with safety oversight, supporting the idea that whistleblowers might have concerns.
• Verification Source #5: "airplane safety and quality control are mission" highlights the importance of these factors, indirectly supporting the idea that concerns about production standards are valid.
• There are no direct contradictions among the sources, but the lack of explicit support for the "safest" claim weakens the article's initial statement.