Analysis Summary:

The NY Times article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources, with the core claim of Bush, Obama, and Bono commenting on USAID's situation being supported. However, the characterization of USAID as a "doomed agency" and the reason for its state ("gutting of USAID") suggests a moderate bias against Trump's administration. The sources confirm the event and the general sentiment but don't explicitly verify the "doomed" status.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Bush, Obama and Bono Commend USAID Staff Members on Their Last Day.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: Support the claim that Bush, Obama, and Bono commented on USAID's last day as an independent agency.
• Claim:** Two ex-presidents and a rock star thanked the outgoing workers of a doomed agency.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: Support the involvement of Bush, Obama, and Bono. The "doomed agency" characterization is not directly supported by these sources, although they mention the "gutting of USAID" by Trump (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5), implying a negative outcome.
• Claim:** Implied claim that USAID is being significantly negatively impacted by Trump's actions.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: Support this implied claim by stating that Bush, Obama, and Bono "fault Trump's gutting of USAID."

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Monday was the last day as an independent agency for the six-decade-old humanitarian and development organization, created by President John F." This supports the claim that it was USAID's last day as an independent agency.
• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: All mention "Trump's gutting of USAID," indicating a negative impact from Trump's policies. This supports the implied claim of negative impact.
• The term "doomed agency" is not explicitly supported by the sources, but the context provided by the sources implies a negative outlook for USAID.