Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While it correctly identifies a CDC vaccine meeting, some details, like the focus on thimerosal and the presence of a former anti-vaccine group leader, are supported by sources. However, the suggestion of a "more skeptical approach to immunizations" is a potentially biased interpretation. There is a contradiction regarding the meeting's occurrence, as one source claims cancellation.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** C.D.C. Vaccine Meeting on June 25, 2025.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the existence of ACIP meetings (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) at the CDC.
  • Verification Source #3: Confirms a June 25-26, 2025 meeting.
  • Verification Source #4: Contradicts this, stating that FDA and CDC canceled flu vaccine advisory meetings.
• Claim:** The meeting will involve discussion of thimerosal.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions that CDC vaccine advisers will vote on thimerosal in flu shots at the meeting.
  • Verification Source #5: Confirms that a former leader of an anti-vaccine group will present on thimerosal.
• Claim:** "Hints of a more skeptical approach to immunizations have already surfaced."
• This is an interpretive statement. While Verification Source #5 mentions a former leader of an anti-vaccine group presenting, this doesn't necessarily equate to a "more skeptical approach" being adopted by the CDC itself. This is a potential bias.
• Verification Source #1 and #3 do not cover this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #2 and #5 agree that thimerosal is a topic of discussion at the meeting.
• Contradiction:** Verification Source #4 contradicts Verification Source #3 regarding the meeting's occurrence.
• Lack of Coverage:** Verification Source #1 and #3 do not cover the claim about a "more skeptical approach to immunizations."
• Potential Bias:** The statement about a "more skeptical approach" is an interpretation that could be biased, as it's based on the presence of a speaker with a history of anti-vaccine views, but doesn't confirm any shift in the CDC's official stance.