Captain Cook's Endeavour confirmed to be in Rhode Island waters

Captain Cook's Endeavour confirmed to be in Rhode Island waters

The location of the HMS Endeavour, a lost ship belonging to 18th-century British explorer Captain James Cook, has been confirmed as Rhode Island’s Newport Harbor.

Truth Analysis

Factual Accuracy
4/5
Bias Level
4/5
Analysis Summary:

The article's main claim that Captain Cook's Endeavour has been confirmed to be in Rhode Island's Newport Harbor is mostly accurate, supported by multiple sources. However, there was some initial disagreement and the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project (Rimap) had a different view. The article presents the information in a relatively neutral manner, with minimal observable bias.

Detailed Analysis:
  • Claim:** The location of the HMS Endeavour has been confirmed as Rhode Island's Newport Harbor.
    • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim, stating the Australian National Maritime Museum confirms the final resting place of James Cook's Endeavour is in Newport Harbor.
    • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim, stating Captain Cook's long-lost ship is confirmed in Newport Harbor.
    • Verification Source #5: Supports the claim, mentioning the Australian National Maritime Museum confirms Captain Cook's vessel as shipwreck in Newport Harbor.
    • Verification Source #1: Initially, there was a disagreement, with the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project (Rimap) disputing the claim. This suggests the confirmation wasn't universally accepted initially.
    • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim, stating the final report confirms identification of the famed vessel scuttled off Rhode Island in 1778.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
  • Agreement:** Multiple sources (Verification Source #3, #4, #5, #2) agree that the Endeavour's location has been confirmed as Newport Harbor, Rhode Island.
  • Disagreement:** Verification Source #1 highlights an initial disagreement from the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology Project (Rimap), suggesting the confirmation wasn't straightforward. This initial disagreement is not mentioned in the CBS World article, which could be seen as a minor omission.
  • Lack of Coverage:** The CBS World article doesn't delve into the details of the identification process or the specific evidence used to confirm the ship's identity. The article also doesn't mention the initial disagreement from Rimap.