Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, with the core claim about Wendy McMahon's departure and her association with Bill Owens supported by provided sources. However, the framing of the departure "amid network's tensions with Trump" suggests a bias, and the extent of these tensions is not fully substantiated by the provided sources. The article relies on the reader inferring a connection between the departure and Trump's actions, which could be misleading.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Wendy McMahon, the president of CBS News and Stations, had allied herself with Bill Owens, the “60 Minutes” executive producer who recently resigned.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, stating "Wendy McMahon, the head of CBS stations and news, saying she supported Owens and everything he's…"
• Claim:** Bill Owens recently resigned.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, stating "Behind '60 Minutes' executive producer's departure..."
• Claim:** The departure happened "amid network's tensions with Trump."
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that Trump filed a lawsuit against CBS, which could be interpreted as a tension. However, the article doesn't explicitly state that the departure was *caused* by these tensions.
  • Verification Source #1: Shows Trump has positive approval ratings, which could contradict the idea of widespread tensions.
  • Verification Source #3, #4, #5: *Fail to cover* the specific claim of tensions between CBS and Trump related to McMahon's departure.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2: "Behind '60 Minutes' executive producer's departure: Trump's lawsuit against CBS ... Wendy McMahon, the head of CBS stations and news, saying she supported Owens and everything he's…" This supports the connection between Owens' departure, Trump's lawsuit, and McMahon's support for Owens.
• Verification Source #1: "President Trump has started his term with net positive marks from Americans overall." This suggests that Trump is not universally disliked, which could weaken the narrative of widespread tensions.
• The article's title and framing imply a direct causal link between Trump's actions and McMahon's departure, which is not explicitly supported by the provided sources. This suggests a potential bias.