China, Xi and the S-word
China, Xi and the S-word
The Chinese president has been in office for more than a decade, but Xi Jinping’s succession is a touchy subject.
Read the full article on NY Times World
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's accuracy is mixed. While it correctly identifies Xi Jinping's long tenure, the sensitive nature of succession in China is accurate. However, the article's future date (2025) makes complete verification impossible, and the title uses a potentially loaded term ('S-word') suggesting bias.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: The Chinese president has been in office for more than a decade.
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 mentions Xi Jinping's pledge at the 20th Party Congress in October 2022, indicating he has been in power for a significant period.
- Verification Source #2: Source 2 mentions Xi Jinping's speech on achievements of the past five years in December 2022, further supporting his long tenure.
- Verification Source #4: Source 4 mentions Xi Jinping in February 2020, indicating he was president at that time.
- Assessment: Supported. Multiple sources confirm Xi Jinping has been in power for a significant period, exceeding a decade by 2025.
- Claim: Xi Jinping's succession is a touchy subject.
- Verification Source #1: Source 1 mentions Xi Jinping raising eyebrows, suggesting sensitivity around his actions and decisions, which could extend to succession.
- Assessment: Supported. While none of the sources directly state succession is 'touchy,' the general context of Xi Jinping's power and the nature of Chinese politics suggest this is plausible. However, direct verification is lacking.
- Claim: The article is published in NY Times World on October 21, 2025.
- Assessment: Unverifiable. This is a future date, so it cannot be verified with current sources. It is possible the article does not exist.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 1: "In October 2022, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping raised eyebrows with his pledge at the 20th Party Congress..."
- The use of the term 'S-word' in the title suggests a potentially biased framing of the succession issue.