‘Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, New Documents Show
‘Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, New Documents Show

The Trump administration has been releasing previously secret material related to the Russia investigation as it seeks to change the subject from its broken promise to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Read the full article on NY Times Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's claim that newly released documents show Russian spies likely created the 'Clinton Plan' emails is weakly supported and potentially contradicted by available sources. The article exhibits a moderate bias by framing the document release as a Trump administration attempt to distract from other issues. The accuracy is questionable due to the reliance on potentially biased sources and the lack of strong corroboration.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: ‘Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, New Documents Show
- Verification Source #2: Mentions 'purported Clinton Plan' in relation to Trump and Russian emails, suggesting the existence of such a plan was previously declassified and made public.
- Verification Source #4: Claims Russia is 'probably' involved and that the assessment was made after months of investigation.
- Verification Source #5: Mentions Russian interference in the 2016 elections to damage Clinton.
- Assessment: The claim is weakly supported. While sources acknowledge Russian interference in the 2016 election and the existence of a 'Clinton Plan,' the direct link and certainty that Russian spies created the emails are not definitively proven by the provided sources. Source 4 suggests a 'probably' involvement, indicating uncertainty. The claim is potentially contradicted by the lack of stronger evidence in the Durham report (source 2).
- Claim: The Trump administration has been releasing previously secret material related to the Russia investigation as it seeks to change the subject from its broken promise to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.
- Assessment: This claim is unverified by the provided sources. It presents a potential motive for the document release, suggesting a political agenda. Without external verification, it remains an assertion.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Source 4 uses the word 'probably' when assessing Russia's involvement, indicating a level of uncertainty.
- Source 2 mentions the 'purported Clinton Plan' was previously declassified, suggesting the information was already public knowledge.
- The article's framing of the document release as a distraction tactic suggests a bias against the Trump administration.