Comey asks court to toss indictment, arguing senator's questions were "confusing"
Comey asks court to toss indictment, arguing senator's questions were "confusing"
Former FBI Director James Comey is arguing his testimony in response to Sen. Ted Cruz’s questions was “literally true” and cannot support a conviction.
Read the full article on CBS Politics
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article's core claim that Comey is seeking to dismiss an indictment based on his testimony being 'literally true' seems plausible given Comey's history and legal strategies. However, without provided verification sources, a definitive accuracy score is difficult to assign. The article appears to present the information with a slight slant towards Comey's perspective, but it's not overtly biased.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim: Former FBI Director James Comey is arguing his testimony in response to Sen. Ted Cruz's questions was 'literally true' and cannot support a conviction.
- Assessment: Unverified. This is the central claim, and without external sources, it's impossible to confirm the specifics of Comey's legal argument or the existence of an indictment. Based on general knowledge of legal defenses, the 'literally true' defense is a known strategy, making the claim plausible but not definitively verified.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- No supporting evidence provided as no verification sources were given.