Analysis Summary:

The CBS News article about courtroom illustrators appears to be highly accurate. The core claim that courtroom illustrators work where cameras are banned is supported by multiple sources. The article presents a neutral overview of the profession.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Courtroom illustrators capture the famous and infamous in the courtroom.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating "Lee Cowan introduces us to the artists who capture the famous and the infamous in the courtroom..."
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, mentioning "Courtroom sketch artists: Documenting history where cameras aren't allowed..."
• Claim:** Courtroom illustrators use ink, pastels, and watercolor.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, stating "...with ink, pastels and watercolor."
• Claim:** Cameras are often banned in courtrooms.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports this claim, mentioning "...where cameras are not allowed."
  • Verification Source #4: Supports this claim, stating "Because Judges have, and often execute the authority to ban cameras in their courtroom."

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1 and #2 both support the claim that courtroom illustrators work where cameras are banned and use various art mediums.
• Verification Source #4 explains the reason for courtroom illustrators' existence: judges often ban cameras.
• Verification Source #3 and #5 link to the CBS video, confirming its existence and topic.
• There are no contradictions between the sources.