Analysis Summary:

The article's central claim about the Supreme Court setting a higher bar for blocking Trump administration policies is plausible, but the provided sources offer limited direct support. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on the impact on blocking Trump administration policies, potentially framing the issue within a specific political context. Several claims remain unverified due to lack of direct coverage in the provided sources.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "The Supreme Court has set a new, higher bar for judges seeking to block Trump administration policies nationwide." This claim is partially supported by the general context of the provided sources, which discuss limitations on court power and nationwide injunctions. However, none of the sources *directly* confirm the Supreme Court's action specifically related to Trump administration policies. The Skadden article (Verification Source #1) discusses nationwide injunctions related to the Corporate Transparency Act, which provides some indirect support for the idea of limitations on court power.
• Claim 2:** "But some legal routes remain open." This is a general statement and difficult to verify without more specifics. The Skadden article (Verification Source #1) implies this by discussing the courts being split on the CTA.
• Overall:** The article's framing suggests a specific political context (Trump administration policies), which introduces a potential for bias. The provided sources do not explicitly confirm the direct link to Trump administration policies, but they do discuss related concepts like limitations on court power and nationwide injunctions.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** Verification Source #1 discusses nationwide injunctions, which aligns with the article's theme of limitations on judicial power.
• Lack of Coverage:** None of the provided sources *directly* confirm the Supreme Court's action specifically related to Trump administration policies.
• Contradiction:** There are no direct contradictions between the article and the provided sources.
• Internal Knowledge:** Without access to legal databases or news archives from the specified date (June 28, 2025), it's difficult to definitively confirm the specific Supreme Court action mentioned.