Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the primary claim about the data going offline supported by multiple sources. However, there's a minor discrepancy regarding the exact date, and the potential impact of the data loss, while plausible, is presented with a slant that suggests a negative outcome.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** U.S. officials said they would stop providing the satellite data online on July 31 rather at the end of June.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 all refer to the data going offline, but specify June 27th as the date of the original article, implying the data was already going offline around that time. The claim that the date was shifted to July 31st is not explicitly contradicted, but it presents a discrepancy.
  • Internal Knowledge: It is plausible that the date was shifted, but without further verification, this remains a minor discrepancy.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: All sources confirm the core claim that critical hurricane monitoring data is going offline.
• Verification Source #1, #3, #4, and #5: These sources state that the loss of data could "hamstring forecasters' ability to track hurricanes," which supports the potential negative impact.
• The discrepancy regarding the date (end of June vs. July 31) is a minor point that requires further verification.