Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While the core idea of Democrats planning a policy agenda is plausible, the specific framing as a "Project 2029" and the internal debate described are only partially verifiable through the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias by framing the Democratic initiative in response to the Republican "Project 2025," potentially creating a sense of reactive rather than proactive planning.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The plan to write a policy agenda for the next Democratic president is at the center of a raging debate within the party: whether its biggest problem is its ideas or its difficulty in selling them."
  • Verification Source #1: Fails to cover this specific claim about a "Project 2029" or internal debate. It only provides the 2024 Democratic Party Platform.
  • Verification Source #2: Focuses on the Republican "Project 2025." It does not cover any Democratic equivalent.
  • Verification Source #3: Mentions "Project 2025" and its availability to both parties initially, but doesn't confirm a Democratic "Project 2029."
  • Verification Source #4: Discusses the Heritage Foundation's "Mandate for Leadership" but doesn't mention a Democratic equivalent.
  • Verification Source #5: Mentions a Democrat laying the groundwork for taking back the gavel, but it's unrelated to a presidential policy agenda.
  • Internal Knowledge:* It is common for political parties to develop policy agendas in anticipation of future elections. However, the specific name "Project 2029" and the described internal debate are not widely known or confirmed by the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The existence of the Republican "Project 2025" is confirmed by Verification Source #2 and #3.
• Verification Source #1 provides evidence of a Democratic Party Platform, indicating policy planning, but doesn't confirm a "Project 2029."
• Verification Source #3 initially made the playbook available to both parties.
• The lack of coverage in the provided sources regarding a Democratic "Project 2029" suggests the framing might be a narrative choice by the NY Times, potentially exaggerating the scale or formalization of the Democratic planning.