Analysis Summary:

The article appears generally accurate based on common knowledge of international relations and news reporting. However, without external verification, the specific claim about the Danish Prime Minister's statement and the summoning of the US diplomat cannot be definitively confirmed. The article seems relatively neutral, presenting the information in a straightforward manner.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Denmark leader says 'you cannot spy against an ally'" - Without verification, it's impossible to confirm the exact quote. However, it's plausible given the context of alleged US intelligence gathering. *Verification Source: N/A* (Internal Knowledge: Plausible statement given the context).
• Claim:** "The Denmark prime minister's comments come a day after the top American diplomat in the country was summoned for an explanation of reports of U.S. intelligence gathering in Greenland." - This claim is also plausible given similar past events and reporting on international relations. However, without external sources, it's impossible to verify the timing and specific details of the summoning. *Verification Source: N/A* (Internal Knowledge: Plausible event given the context).
• Claim:** "Reports of U.S. intelligence gathering in Greenland" - This alludes to a broader issue that has been reported on in the past. The existence of such reports is likely accurate. *Verification Source: N/A* (Internal Knowledge: Plausible based on past news reports).

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Due to the lack of provided verification sources, there is no supporting evidence to cite directly.
• There are no direct contradictions, but the lack of verification means the accuracy of the claims cannot be definitively established.
• The analysis relies heavily on internal knowledge and general understanding of international relations and news reporting, which is a significant limitation.