Analysis Summary:

The article makes general claims about Richard Cordray's role and criticisms he faced. Without provided verification sources, assessing factual accuracy is limited. The tone suggests a moderate bias, framing Cordray as embattled and facing unfair criticism, but also acknowledging the power he wielded.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Richard Cordray has been called one of the most powerful men in Washington, which comes with a price."
• Verification Source: N/A. This is a general statement. While plausible given Cordray's role as CFPB Director, it's difficult to verify definitively without sources. *Internal Knowledge:* As CFPB Director, Cordray had significant regulatory power over the financial industry, making this a reasonable assessment.
• Claim:** "He's been rebuked, criticized and insulted on Capitol Hill."
• Verification Source: N/A. This is a general claim about Cordray's experience. *Internal Knowledge:* The CFPB and Cordray faced significant opposition from Republicans in Congress, making this claim plausible. However, the specific instances of "rebukes, criticisms, and insults" are not verifiable without sources.
• Claim:** "vows to make sure 'people are treated fairly'"
• Verification Source: N/A. This is a direct quote attributed to Cordray. Without the full video or transcript, it's impossible to verify the context or accuracy of the quote.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Due to the lack of provided verification sources, I am relying on *internal knowledge* of the political climate surrounding the CFPB and Richard Cordray during his tenure.
• The claims are generally plausible given the context, but lack specific evidence for verification.
• There are no contradictions, but the lack of source material limits the ability to confirm accuracy.