Extended interview: "Oh, Mary!" Tony nominee Cole Escola
Extended interview: "Oh, Mary!" Tony nominee Cole Escola

In this web exclusive, actor and playwright Cole Escola talks with correspondent Mo Rocca about the genesis of the Broadway farce “Oh, Mary!,” the over-the-top comedy about Mary Todd Lincoln and her secret passion of becoming a cabaret star, for which Escola earned two Tony Award nominations. Escola also discusses their childhood in Oregon and early experiences in New York City, and gives Rocca a tour of their bespoke-decorated dressing room.
Read the full article on CBS Entertainment
Truth Analysis
Analysis Summary:
The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The primary claims regarding Cole Escola's Tony nominations for "Oh, Mary!" are supported. There is minimal bias, presenting the information in a straightforward manner.
Detailed Analysis:
- Claim:** Cole Escola is a Tony nominee for "Oh, Mary!".
- Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, mentioning the play "Oh, Mary!" on Broadway.
- Claim:** "Oh, Mary!" is a comedy about Mary Todd Lincoln and her secret passion of becoming a cabaret star.
- Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, describing the play as "Brilliantly, Hilariously Silly" and implicitly confirming the comedic nature.
- Claim:** Cole Escola discusses their childhood in Oregon and early experiences in New York City.
- Fail to cover:* None of the provided sources cover this specific claim. This is based on the article snippet that states this is part of the interview.
- Claim:** Cole Escola gives Rocca a tour of their bespoke-decorated dressing room.
- Fail to cover:* None of the provided sources cover this specific claim. This is based on the article snippet that states this is part of the interview.
Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:
- Verification Source #1: Confirms the existence and comedic nature of the play "Oh, Mary!" and implicitly supports the claim that Cole Escola is associated with it.
- The other sources (Verification Source #2, #3, #4, #5) are irrelevant to the claims made in the article.