Analysis Summary:

The article's core claim about potential changes to parental rights for individuals convicted of child sexual offenses is partially verifiable. The provided sources offer some context regarding family law, parental rights, and child safety, but do not directly confirm or deny the specific law change mentioned in the BBC article. The title itself suggests a negative framing, indicating a moderate bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Those convicted of child sexual offences may not be banned from contact with their own offspring.
  • Verification Source #1: Discusses child safety in custody cases, indicating that abuse and coercive control are considered. This *fails to directly cover* the specific law change, but implies that child safety is a key consideration in custody decisions.
  • Verification Source #2: Mentions changes to rules around legal aid and reinstating parental responsibility. This *partially supports* the idea that parental rights are subject to change and legal proceedings.
  • Verification Source #3: Discusses children's rights and family law, but *fails to cover* the specific claim about parental rights for convicted offenders.
  • Verification Source #4: Is irrelevant to the topic.
  • Verification Source #5: Is irrelevant to the topic.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: highlights the importance of child safety in custody cases, suggesting that courts consider abuse.
• Verification Source #2: indicates that parental responsibility can be reinstated through family court, implying that it can also be initially removed or restricted.
• The lack of direct confirmation from the provided sources regarding the specific law change necessitates a lower factual accuracy score. The title's phrasing ("Family criticises...") suggests a potential bias by focusing on criticism rather than objective reporting.