Analysis Summary:

The article makes a single, verifiable claim about an FBI arrest related to a planned attack. While the claim itself seems plausible, the provided sources do not directly confirm or deny it. Therefore, the accuracy is mixed due to the lack of direct verification. The article appears to be relatively neutral in its presentation.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Federal authorities say they arrested a 19-year-old man who is accused of spending months planning an attack on a U.S. Army site in suburban Detroit.
• Verification Status: The provided sources do not directly confirm or deny this specific claim. Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 all discuss terrorism, FBI investigations, and related topics, but none mention this specific incident.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer direct support or contradiction for the claim.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions that preventing terrorist attacks is a top priority for the FBI and DHS. This aligns with the general nature of the claim, but does not confirm the specific incident.
• Verification Source #3: Mentions terrorists carrying out attacks on military outposts, which provides a general context for the plausibility of the claim, but does not confirm the specific incident.
• Due to the lack of direct verification from the provided sources, I am refraining from using internal knowledge to assess the claim's accuracy.