Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, with the core claim supported by multiple sources. However, the framing of the headline and snippet, specifically focusing on "antisemitism" and Harvard, introduces a moderate bias by potentially oversimplifying a broader policy change. The sources confirm the social media vetting of visa applicants but don't always explicitly link it solely to antisemitism or Harvard.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Federal officials are set to start reviewing the social media accounts of visa applicants who plan to attend, work at or visit Harvard University.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that federal officials are reviewing social media accounts of visa applicants.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that the US is expanding social media vetting of visa applicants. It also mentions Harvard University students in relation to visas.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the claim that officials are introducing reviews of social media accounts for visa applicants.
  • Verification Source #4: Supports the claim that visa applicants have been providing social media account information since 2019. It also mentions international students at Harvard.
  • Verification Source #5: Supports the general practice of social media surveillance by federal agencies.
• Analysis: The core claim is supported by multiple sources. However, the specific focus on Harvard and antisemitism is not explicitly stated in all sources.

• Claim:** The review is for "any signs of antisemitism."
  • Verification Source #1: Does not explicitly state that the review is *only* for signs of antisemitism.
  • Verification Source #2: Does not explicitly state that the review is *only* for signs of antisemitism.
  • Verification Source #3: Does not explicitly state that the review is *only* for signs of antisemitism.
  • Verification Source #4: Does not explicitly state that the review is *only* for signs of antisemitism.
  • Verification Source #5: Does not explicitly state that the review is *only* for signs of antisemitism.
• Analysis: While the review *may* include looking for signs of antisemitism, the provided sources do not confirm that this is the *sole* purpose. This is a potential oversimplification or slant in the article.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Federal officials to vet social media accounts of visa applicants..." supports the core claim.
• Verification Source #2: "US halts student visa appointments and plans expanded social media vetting of such applicants" supports the expansion of social media vetting.
• Verification Source #4: "visa applicants to provide social media account information on application forms since 2019" shows that social media vetting is not a new practice.
• The lack of explicit mention of "antisemitism" as the *sole* focus of the vetting in the provided sources suggests a potential bias in the article's framing.