Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate, focusing on the limitations of FEMA's flood maps in capturing flash flood risks. The provided sources generally support the claim that FEMA maps have coverage gaps and may not fully represent the risk of flash floods. There is a slight bias towards highlighting the shortcomings of FEMA's maps.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** FEMA's flood maps often miss dangerous flash flood risks.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: All support this claim, stating that FEMA flood maps have significant coverage gaps and often miss dangerous flash flood risks.
• Claim:** FEMA has improved the accuracy and accessibility of the maps over time with better data, digital tools and community input.
• This claim is partially supported by the general context of the sources, which acknowledge FEMA's role in flood risk assessment. However, none of the provided sources explicitly detail improvements in accuracy and accessibility due to better data, digital tools, and community input. This claim is not directly contradicted, but lacks specific verification from the provided sources.
• Claim:** The maps still don't capture everything.
  • Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5: Support this claim by highlighting the "coverage gaps" in FEMA's flood maps.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Agreement:** All provided sources (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) agree that FEMA's flood maps often miss dangerous flash flood risks and have significant coverage gaps.
• Lack of Coverage:** The specific details of improvements in FEMA's maps due to better data, digital tools, and community input are not explicitly covered by the provided sources.
• Evidence:** Verification Source #3 highlights that FEMA's maps have failed to take rainfall and flash flooding into account for decades.