Analysis Summary:

The article snippet presents a claim about the prolonged suffering of an executed individual due to bullets missing the target. Without external verification sources, it's difficult to assess the accuracy of the pathologist's claim. The language used ("extreme pain") suggests a potential bias towards highlighting the suffering associated with this method of execution.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** "A pathologist hired by death row inmates' attorneys says a South Carolina man executed by firing squad was conscious and likely in extreme pain for up to a minute."
• This is the central claim of the snippet. Without Verification Sources, I must rely on internal knowledge. It is plausible that if bullets missed vital organs or the heart, consciousness and pain could persist for a short period. However, the duration and intensity of pain are subjective and difficult to ascertain definitively post-mortem. The claim is presented as a statement of fact from an expert, but without further context or corroboration, its accuracy is uncertain.
• Verification Source #N: Not applicable (no sources provided).
• Status: Unverified.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Due to the lack of Verification Sources, I cannot provide supporting evidence or contradictions. My internal knowledge suggests the claim is plausible but requires further investigation and corroboration from reliable sources. The phrase "extreme pain" is subjective and could be interpreted as emotionally charged language.
• Verification Source #N: Not applicable (no sources provided).