Analysis Summary:

The article is mostly accurate, focusing on Greg Rosen's reaction to Trump's pardons related to the January 6th cases. The main claims are supported by provided sources, though the article's framing and word choice suggest a moderate bias against Trump's actions. Some claims are not directly verifiable within the provided sources, but are plausible given the context.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** Greg Rosen, the prosecutor who oversaw the Jan. 6 cases, has resigned.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim.
• Claim:** He is speaking for the first time about President Trump's pardons for Capitol riot defendants and its impact on the DOJ and FBI.
  • Verification Source #1: Supports the claim that Rosen is speaking about Trump's pardons. The claim about it being "the first time" is difficult to verify definitively with the provided sources, but plausible.
• Claim:** President Trump's pardons of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol rioters continue to shock and alarm the federal investigators who handled the cases.
  • Verification Source #1: Directly supports this claim.
  • Verification Source #2: Supports the claim that prosecutors found the pardons "shocking."
• Implicit Claim:** Trump issued pardons for Jan 6 rioters.
• Verification Source #2: Supports this claim.
• Verification Source #3: Mentions the January 6, 2021 rioters and prosecutions.
• Implicit Claim:** The DOJ and FBI were involved in investigating and prosecuting Jan 6 cases.
• Verification Source #3: Supports the DOJ prosecution of rioters.
• Verification Source #5: Mentions the FBI agents who investigated the Capitol riot.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "President Trump's pardons of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol rioters continue to shock and alarm the federal investigators who handled the cases." This directly supports the claim that the pardons were shocking to investigators.
• Verification Source #2: "Ashley Akers, who worked on Jan. 6 cases and left the Justice Department on Friday, called the pardons “shocking” and said she had a…" This provides further evidence that prosecutors involved in the Jan. 6 cases were surprised by the pardons.
• Verification Source #3: "President Biden's DOJ prosecuted nearly 1,600 of the January 6, 2021, rioters—many for acts of shocking violence against police and…" This supports the context of the article, highlighting the scale of the prosecutions related to the January 6th riot.
• Verification Source #4: Does not directly relate to the claims in the article, but provides context about investigations involving Trump.
• Verification Source #5: Provides context about DOJ investigations related to Jan 6.
• There are no direct contradictions between the article's claims and the provided verification sources. The bias stems from the framing of the issue and the selection of quotes that emphasize the negative reaction to the pardons, without presenting counterarguments or justifications for the pardons.