Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While some claims align with available poll data and general political sentiment, others lack direct verification or are presented with a clear negative slant towards Trump. The statement about burning goodwill quickly is subjective and difficult to verify definitively.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "It’s not easy to burn this much good will so fast, and it doesn’t usually get any easier from here." This is a subjective assessment of Trump's political standing. It's difficult to verify goodwill directly. *Verification Source #2:* shows Trump's inaugural approval rating was historically low, which could be interpreted as a lack of initial goodwill. However, this doesn't directly verify the claim of "burning" it quickly.
• Claim:** (Implied) Trump's poll numbers are weak. *Verification Source #1:* indicates that Republicans are more likely to say Trump's policies are making the nation's economy stronger (71%) than weaker (15%). This suggests a partisan divide, but doesn't definitively confirm "weak" poll numbers overall. *Verification Source #5:* shows that in a hypothetical election, Biden would outperform Trump among registered voters. This supports the idea of Trump's poll numbers being weak relative to Biden.
• Claim:** (Implied) The US economy is not viewed positively. *Verification Source #3:* states that Americans' views of the US economy are largely negative. This indirectly supports the idea that negative economic perceptions could be contributing to Trump's "weak" poll numbers.
• Claim:** (Implied) Political violence is a factor in the US. *Verification Source #4:* discusses the rise of political violence in the United States. This could be a factor influencing public opinion and potentially impacting Trump's poll numbers, but the article snippet doesn't directly link it to Trump.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #2:* supports the idea that Trump's initial approval was low, which could be interpreted as a lack of initial goodwill.
• Verification Source #3:* supports the idea that negative economic perceptions could be contributing to Trump's "weak" poll numbers.
• Verification Source #5:* supports the idea of Trump's poll numbers being weak relative to Biden.
• Verification Source #1:* shows a partisan divide in views of Trump's policies, which complicates the assessment of his overall poll numbers.
• Verification Source #4:* discusses political violence, which could be a factor influencing public opinion, but doesn't directly link it to Trump.
• The claim about "burning goodwill" is not directly supported or contradicted by any of the provided sources. It relies on interpretation and general political knowledge.