Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. While it mentions the parade and Fox News coverage, the claims about protests, a political assassination, and Middle East strikes are not directly verified by the provided sources. The article exhibits moderate bias by focusing on Fox News' positive coverage while implying a lack of balance due to other events.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "Fox News Hosts Gushed Over the Parade" - This is partially supported by Verification Source #3, which shows Trump asking a Fox News reporter to "gush" over something, implying a tendency for positive coverage.
• Claim:** "With No Protests in Sight" - Verification Source #1 mentions "No Kings protests" but doesn't directly confirm or deny their presence at the parade. Verification Source #2 mentions CBS News promoting "No Kings Day" anti-Trump protest merchandise. This suggests protests were happening, potentially contradicting the claim.
• Claim:** "Cable networks covered President Trump’s Army parade" - This is not directly confirmed or denied by the provided sources.
• Claim:** "a busy day of protests, a political assassination and Middle East strikes" - None of the provided sources directly confirm or deny these events occurring on the same day as the parade. This remains unverified.
• Claim:** "ABC, CBS and NBC aired other programming on their affiliates" - This is not directly confirmed or denied by the provided sources.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #3: Supports the idea of Fox News providing favorable coverage to Trump.
• Verification Source #1 and #2: Suggest the existence of anti-Trump protests, potentially contradicting the claim of "no protests in sight."
• Lack of Coverage: The claims about a political assassination, Middle East strikes, and the programming choices of ABC, CBS, and NBC are not covered by the provided sources.