Analysis Summary:

The article's accuracy is mixed. The core claim about Gove's changed position is plausible given the context of ongoing debate about Scottish independence, but the snippet provided is too short to verify the extent of his agreement with Swinney. The snippet lacks sufficient detail for a comprehensive assessment, and the title itself suggests a potential slant towards highlighting a change in position, which could be seen as moderate bias.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim 1:** Gove 'in agreement' with Swinney over second independence referendum.
• Verification Source #1: Mentions Scotland's division on independence. Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #2: Mentions the First Minister's desire for an agreement on a referendum. Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #3: Confirms the proposal for a second referendum. Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #4: Mentions the 2014 referendum and negotiations. Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #5: Discusses the "now-is-not-the-time" discourse. Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Analysis: The snippet is too short to verify the extent of the agreement. The sources do not directly confirm or deny Gove's agreement. Without the full article, it is impossible to determine the accuracy of this claim.

• Claim 2:** Former Tory MP Michael Gove reveals his change in position over a second vote.
• Verification Source #1: Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #2: Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #3: Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #4: Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Verification Source #5: Fails to cover Gove's specific position.
• Analysis: The snippet suggests a change in Gove's position. The sources do not directly confirm or deny this claim. Without the full article, it is impossible to determine the accuracy of this claim.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• The provided sources do not offer direct support or contradiction for the claims made in the article snippet. The sources generally confirm the context of ongoing discussions about a second Scottish independence referendum (Verification Source #1, #2, #3, #4, #5).
• The lack of coverage in the provided sources limits the ability to assess the factual accuracy of the claims.
• The title's emphasis on a "change in position" suggests a potential bias towards highlighting a shift in political stance.