Analysis Summary:

The article appears mostly accurate based on the provided sources. The primary claim about the NHS seeking to identify more infected blood victims is supported. There is minimal observable bias, presenting the information in a straightforward manner.

Detailed Analysis:

• Claim:** "The NHS is trying to find many hundreds of people exposed to the virus via contaminated blood in the 1970s, 80s and 90s."
  • Verification Source #1: Supports this claim, mentioning concerns that hundreds infected at birth could be unaware.
  • Verification Source #3: Supports the need to find undiagnosed patients.
  • Verification Source #2: Provides information about support for those affected, implying an ongoing effort to identify and assist victims.

Supporting Evidence/Contradictions:

• Verification Source #1: "Infected Blood Scandal Inquiry revealed concerns last year that hundreds infected at birth could be living unaware." This directly supports the claim that the NHS is trying to find more victims.
• Verification Source #3: "NHS practices should routinely ask new patients whether they had a blood transfusion before 1996 to find undiagnosed patients." This supports the claim that the NHS is actively seeking to identify more infected blood victims.
• Verification Source #2: Provides information about the England Infected Blood Support Scheme, indicating an ongoing effort to support those affected, which indirectly supports the claim that the NHS is trying to find more victims.
• Verification Source #4 and #5 are not relevant to the claim.